
I'm happy to see a flood of comments and activity around the Corner these days! Thanks to a little help from Yahoo and other sources, a bunch of folks are seeing Creative Writing Corner for the first time. I welcome comments and I'm pledging to do a better job responding to them, beginning with a regular Mailbag series. So let's get started with a post that got a healthy reception,
Why Short Stories Aren't Novels.
Several commenters agreed that there is something different about the process of writing short stories versus novels, and they argued that it had something to do with time. As Tracy Jones wrote,
"Time is usually always in the essence and being able to write or even read something takes time to get around to."
Thanks, Tracy! It's true that it takes time to get used to either format. I'd also say time is of the essence especially with short stories, which need a stronger sense of urgency and anxiety in order to keep people turning the pages.
Steven brings up an interesting point about whether people are more likely to finish a story or book:
"I'm more likely to read a short story from end-to-end rather than a trashy novel precisely because it's a significant waste of time, whereas the short fiction is a minor waste of time."
It's true that a story is less of an investment of time. But once you've gotten someone reading a little, I would argue that a novel is actually
more likely to be finished. Once you've made that bigger investment, you're more likely to keep going and get that payoff you've read for. A story, which has less of a time investment, can be dropped more easily because you're not going to feel like you've wasted a huge amount of time if you don't finish.
For those of you thinking about novels, Naomi points out that short stories can get you inspired for a larger work:
"...a short story will get you into the feel and the complexities of writing longer prose. A novel takes a lot of time and consideration...Eleqently-put, writing short stories and poetry gets you inspired and ready to put pen to paper and begin that novel you have hoped to create for five years."
You could see short stories as early fodder for your novel, or as I've written in this post, there's nothing wrong with perfecting the art of the story as a short-form work of art. And I'm glad to see
DeidraK agrees with me and is interested in working on stories:
"I've recently concluded that I am not interested in writing a novel, a collection of short stories yes, a novel no. The novel assumes the reader has time and will stick it out. Well, for me as the writer, I can't stick it out as my attention span isn't long enough to write a full novel in a reasonable amount of time (less than a decade)."
I agree that right now, I don't feel quite ready for a novel, and I'm proud to be working on short stories. Thank you to all the commenters. In the next mailbag post, I'll respond to comments about
Why I Said No to NaNoWriMo.